We use cookies
We use cookies to help this site function, understand service usage, and support marketing efforts. Visit Cookie Policy to change preferences anytime.
Most investors either check their portfolio too often, reacting to every market move, or not often enough, letting problems compound quietly. The right approach is a structured, once-a-year audit — not a quick look at returns, but a review of six specific things that determine whether your portfolio still fits your goals and risk profile. Done properly, it takes most investors just 20–30 minutes and surfaces what actually matters.
Annual reviews are for calm, systematic assessment. There are specific moments when reviewing your portfolio is actively counterproductive — because the emotional context distorts every conclusion.
The question: Is each fund in my portfolio keeping up with the right benchmark for its category?
How to check: Calculate your XIRR for each fund — not absolute return — and compare it to the fund's designated benchmark return over the same period. The benchmark is listed in the fund's factsheet. Use the TRI (Total Return Index) version of the benchmark, which includes dividends.
Threshold for concern: One year of underperformance is normal and not a reason to act. A fund that has trailed its category benchmark meaningfully for three or more consecutive years — across different market conditions — warrants a closer look. Compare it to other funds in the same category over the same period before deciding.
📌 What to do: If a fund is underperforming vs benchmark and category peers for 3+ years → consider switching to a stronger fund in the same category or an index fund. If performance is in line → no action needed, continue and review again next year.
The question: Are any of my funds doing the same job — holding largely the same stocks in the same proportions?
How to check: List every equity fund you hold and its SEBI category. Any category where you hold more than one fund is a potential overlap candidate. For each pair, check the top 20 holdings using the most recent AMFI monthly portfolio disclosure. Note how many positions appear in both.
Threshold for concern: Two funds in the same category sharing more than 50% of their top positions by weight are largely duplicating each other. Holding both adds complexity and cost without meaningfully reducing risk.
📌 What to do: Stop new SIPs into the weaker fund. Plan a phased exit using the LTCG exemption window across one or two financial years. Do not exit all at once if it triggers a large capital gains event.
The question: What percentage of my total portfolio is currently in equity vs debt vs other asset classes — and how does that compare to what I originally intended?
How to check: Add up the current market value of all your equity mutual fund holdings, then all your debt fund, liquid fund, and fixed income holdings (FDs, PPF, EPF, bonds). Calculate the ratio. Compare this to your original target allocation.
Why this matters: A portfolio that started at 60% equity and 40% debt in 2021 may have drifted to 75% equity or higher by late 2024 after a sustained equity rally — without any decision being made. The investor is now taking significantly more risk than they originally planned, for a goal that is now three years closer. This is portfolio drift, and it is one of the most common and invisible portfolio problems.
| Original Target (Year 0) | After 3-Year Bull Run (Year 3) |
|---|---|
| 60% Equity / 40% Debt | ~76% Equity / ~24% Debt |
Illustrative only — actual drift depends on specific fund returns and holding period. The pattern (equity growing faster than debt in a bull market) is structurally consistent.
📌 What to do: If equity allocation has drifted more than 10 percentage points from your target → consider rebalancing. The most tax-efficient method is to redirect new SIP contributions toward the underweight asset class, rather than selling equity holdings outright. Verify any redemption decisions against current LTCG rules.
The question: For each active SIP, what goal is it serving — and given today's corpus and the time remaining, is the current SIP amount and fund category still appropriate?
How to check: For each goal, ask three things: (a) What is the current value of money set aside for this goal? (b) How much do I need by when? (c) At the current SIP amount and a reasonable return assumption for the fund category, will I reach that amount?
| Goal | Time Remaining | Right Fund Category? | Action If Misaligned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Child's education | 3–4 years | Switch equity to conservative hybrid or short-duration debt as goal nears | Begin glide path now |
| Retirement | 15+ years | Equity-heavy allocation appropriate | Continue — review allocation as horizon shortens |
| Home down payment | 2 years | Pure equity SIP is too volatile for 2-year horizon | Move to debt or conservative hybrid urgently |
| Emergency corpus | Always liquid | Liquid or overnight fund — not equity | Ensure liquidity, not returns |
📌 What to do: If a goal is within 3 years and its SIP is in a volatile equity category → begin shifting to a more stable category. If the projected corpus at current pace falls short of the goal → increase the SIP amount. Neither action should wait another year.
The question: Do I have 3–6 months of essential monthly expenses in a liquid, accessible, low-volatility form — and has that amount kept pace with how my expenses have grown?
How to check: Add up your current monthly essential expenses (rent or EMI, groceries, utilities, insurance premiums, school fees). Multiply by 6. Compare this to the current value of your liquid fund, savings account, or overnight fund holdings earmarked for emergencies.
The two common failure modes: The first is not having enough — the corpus was set three years ago when expenses were lower and was never revisited. The second is having the emergency fund in the wrong place — locked in an ELSS or equity fund that could be down 20–30% at the exact moment the emergency strikes.
⚠ Common mistake: Counting ELSS or equity funds as part of your emergency corpus. An equity fund that is down 25% in a market correction is not an emergency fund — it is a locked investment that forces you to crystallise a loss at the worst possible moment.
📌 What to do: If your emergency corpus covers less than 3 months of current expenses → build it up before increasing equity SIP amounts. If it is in the wrong instrument (equity, illiquid) → shift it to a liquid or overnight mutual fund.
The question: Do I have unrealised long-term capital gains in my equity funds that I could book this financial year, within the annual LTCG exemption limit, and then reinvest at the new cost basis — effectively reducing my future tax liability?
How to check: For each equity fund held for more than one year, check your unrealised LTCG. This is visible in your fund statement or through your AMC's app. If the total unrealised LTCG across your portfolio is below the annual exemption limit, you may be able to book those gains tax-free, redeem, and reinvest immediately in the same fund — resetting your cost basis.
Why this matters: This is sometimes called LTCG harvesting. Done annually within the exemption limit, it reduces the eventual tax liability when you actually need to withdraw from your portfolio for a goal. The gain is booked tax-free this year; future gains are calculated from the new, higher cost basis.
⚠ Tax verification required: The annual LTCG exemption limit for equity mutual funds, and the applicable LTCG rate, are defined in the Income Tax Act and are subject to change with each Union Budget. Verify the current limit and rate with your tax adviser or the Income Tax Act before acting. This is especially important after any Union Budget announcement.
📌 What to do: If you have unrealised LTCG below the annual exemption limit → consider booking those gains before the financial year ends (31 March) and reinvesting immediately. Do this in consultation with your tax adviser if the amount is significant.
Most years, most investors will finish this checkup and find that one or two checks flag something worth addressing — and four or five checks come back clean. That is a healthy outcome. It means the portfolio is broadly sound, and the one or two issues can be addressed methodically.
Document the review date and the key findings. Update your SIP amounts if income has grown and the increase is affordable. Set a reminder for the same month next year. Then leave the portfolio alone. Checking it again in three months will not improve it — it will only create opportunities for emotional decisions.
Address them one at a time, in order of severity. A misaligned goal near its target date is urgent. A fund that has mildly trailed its benchmark for two years is not. Avoid making multiple simultaneous changes — it makes it harder to understand the impact of each decision and creates unnecessary tax and transaction events.
When the annual review surfaces multiple issues, the temptation is to address everything at once — switch funds, rebalance, increase SIPs, exit overlapping positions. This usually creates more problems than it solves: multiple simultaneous capital gains events, disrupted cost averaging, and a portfolio that is difficult to track in transition.
A better approach: rank the issues by impact (goal misalignment first, fund performance second, overlap third, tax optimisation last) and address them sequentially over the months following the review. The annual checkup is a planning event, not an execution event — most of the actions it surfaces can and should be executed over the following 2–3 months.
For Indian investors, the financial year runs April to March. The most effective annual review schedule aligns with this cycle.
| When | What To Do |
|---|---|
| January – February | Run the full six-point checkup. Focus especially on Check 6 (LTCG harvesting) — this is the last window to act before 31 March. Begin any fund switches that have been identified. |
| March | Execute any LTCG harvesting before 31 March. Complete pending fund switches. Do not make hasty decisions just because the financial year is ending — only act on what was planned in January. |
| April – May | Review after filing returns. Check whether the new financial year's SIP amounts reflect any income growth. Confirm that all planned changes from January are complete and the portfolio is in the intended state. |
| June – December | Leave the portfolio alone unless a significant life event occurs (job change, major expense, marriage, child). The only monitoring needed is a monthly confirmation that SIPs are deducting as expected. Do not act on market news or monthly return fluctuations. |
Annual reviews are the default. But certain events warrant an unscheduled review — not a check of returns, but a check of the six structural factors above:
A market fall of 15–20% is not on this list. That is a market event, not a structural change in your portfolio's soundness. Reviewing the portfolio during a sharp correction almost always leads to decisions that would not be made in a calmer context.
Running all six checks manually means pulling XIRR, benchmark data, overlap analysis, and allocation percentages from different apps and factsheets. A Dhan Saarthi portfolio review brings fund performance, overlap, allocation drift, goal alignment, emergency corpus, and tax position together in a single view, so the checkup takes minutes instead of an evening.
Instead of guessing whether your equity allocation has drifted or whether a goal is falling behind schedule, you get a clear, current read on where your portfolio stands — making it easier to act on the one or two things that actually need attention this year.
The most common portfolio problem in India is not bad fund selection — it is the absence of a systematic review process. This six-point annual checkup covers everything that actually matters: fund performance, overlap, allocation drift, goal alignment, emergency corpus, and tax position. Done consistently, in the right month, it takes just 20–30 minutes and prevents the vast majority of portfolio mistakes Indian investors make — not by predicting markets, but by keeping the portfolio aligned with its purpose.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalised financial or investment advice. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. The goal-to-category mapping and allocation thresholds in this article are practical guidelines, not personalised recommendations — the right approach depends on your individual goals, risk profile, and financial situation. Tax rules referenced in this article are subject to change; verify the current LTCG exemption limit, LTCG rate, and STCG rate with a qualified tax adviser or the Income Tax Act in force at the time of any redemption or investment decision. Please read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing.
Once a year is the right frequency for a structured review of the six factors covered in this article. Monthly checks of return figures serve no useful purpose and increase the risk of emotional decisions. The exception is when a specific event occurs — a goal coming within 24 months of its target date, a significant income change, or a major life event — any of which warrants an unscheduled review of the structural factors.
January to February is the most productive window for Indian investors. It is far enough from the financial year start to have meaningful data for the current year, close enough to 31 March for LTCG harvesting to still be actionable, and before the distraction of tax filing season in April–June. Avoid reviewing during sharp market corrections — the emotional context distorts every conclusion.
For most investors with 5–10 funds, the six-point checkup described in this article takes 20–30 minutes if you have your Consolidated Account Statement (CAS) and the relevant fund factsheets to hand. It should not take longer than that. A review that stretches to hours is a sign that the portfolio is more complex than it needs to be — and that simplification is itself one of the findings.
No — not in the sense of making decisions. A sharp market fall is not a structural event in your portfolio. The six factors this article covers (performance, overlap, allocation, goal alignment, emergency corpus, tax) do not change materially during a correction. Reviewing returns during a sharp fall almost always leads to decisions that would not be made in a calmer context. Keep the scheduled annual review in its intended month; do not move it to coincide with market stress.
LTCG harvesting involves redeeming equity mutual fund units held for more than one year, within the annual LTCG exemption limit, and immediately reinvesting in the same fund. The gain is booked tax-free (within the exemption limit), and your cost basis resets to the current NAV — reducing future taxable gains when you eventually withdraw for a goal. Whether it is worth doing depends on your unrealised gains, the current exemption limit, and your transaction costs. Always verify the current LTCG exemption limit and applicable tax rates with your tax adviser or the Income Tax Act before acting — these change with each Union Budget.
Imagine setting a 60% equity, 40% debt allocation to match your risk tolerance and goals — then finding it has quietly drifted to 76% equity…
Yashna Bhuwania
13 May 2026
How to know if your mutual fund portfolio is actually working Most investors assess their portfolio by opening an app, seeing whether the nu…
Raushan Kumar
13 May 2026
Most people who invest in mutual funds through a bank, an app, or an agent have never actually asked what that person or platform is doing b…
Mahak Jain
11 Sept 2026